Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Patterson v. Mclean Credit Union

• 1988 • 491 U.S. 164 • Rehnquist Court
In Patterson v. McLean Credit Union (1988), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a private employer's racial harassment of an employee was not covered under Section 1981 of the Civil Rights Act of 1866, which guarantees equal rights in making and enforcing contracts to all citizens. The case involved Brenda Patterson, who alleged she had been subjected to racial discrimination and harassment by her employer, McLean Credit Union. She claimed this violated Section 1981 as it impaired her ability to...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Rehnquist Court
Term: 1988
Docket: 87-107
491 U.S. 164
109 S. Ct. 2363
105 L. Ed. 2d 132
1989 U.S. LEXIS 2976
Argued: Feb 29, 1988

Patterson v. Mclean Credit Union

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In Patterson v. McLean Credit Union (1988), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a private employer's racial harassment of an employee was not covered under Section 1981 of the Civil Rights Act of 1866, which guarantees equal rights in making and enforcing contracts to all citizens. The case involved Brenda Patterson, who alleged she had been subjected to racial discrimination and harassment by her employer, McLean Credit Union. She claimed this violated Section 1981 as it impaired her ability to perform on her job contract equally with white employees. However, the court held that while Section 1981 covers refusal or termination of contracts based on race, it does not cover problems arising later such as workplace conditions or quality-of-life issues after employment has begun.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Patterson v. McLean Credit Union, Justice Brennan disagreed with the majority's interpretation of Section 1981 of the Civil Rights Act of 1866. He argued that this law should cover not only contract formation but also problems arising after contracts are made, including harassment and wrongful termination based on race. According to him, such an interpretation would be consistent with both historical context and precedent cases like Runyon v. McCrary (1976). Furthermore, he criticized the majority for ignoring legislative history showing Congress intended a broad application when it reenacted Section 1981 in 1870 and again in 1991. Lastly, he expressed concern about how narrowing its scope could undermine civil rights protections by leaving victims without federal remedies unless they can prove intentional discrimination under Title VII.

Opinion written by Justice AMKennedy
Decided: Jun 15, 1989
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms