Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Payton v. New York

• 1979 • 445 U.S. 573 • Burger Court
In Payton v. New York, the U.S Supreme Court ruled that the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution, which protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures, prohibits police officers from entering a suspect's home without a warrant in order to make a routine felony arrest. The case was brought by Theodore Payton who had been convicted of murder after police entered his apartment without a warrant and found evidence implicating him in the crime. Similarly, Obie Riddick had also been...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Burger Court
Term: 1979
Docket: 78-5420
445 U.S. 573
100 S. Ct. 1371
63 L. Ed. 2d 639
1980 U.S. LEXIS 13
Argued: Mar 26, 1979

Payton v. New York

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In Payton v. New York, the U.S Supreme Court ruled that the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution, which protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures, prohibits police officers from entering a suspect's home without a warrant in order to make a routine felony arrest. The case was brought by Theodore Payton who had been convicted of murder after police entered his apartment without a warrant and found evidence implicating him in the crime. Similarly, Obie Riddick had also been arrested at his home without an arrest warrant for possession of drugs. Both cases were consolidated as they raised similar constitutional questions about whether such arrests violated their Fourth Amendment rights. In its decision delivered by Justice Stevens on April 15th 1980, the court held that both arrests were unconstitutional because they lacked judicial oversight through warrants based on probable cause.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Payton v. New York, Justice White argued that the majority's decision was not supported by historical evidence or precedent and would unnecessarily hinder law enforcement efforts. He contended that there is no constitutional requirement for police to obtain a warrant before entering a suspect's home to make an arrest when they have probable cause. The Fourth Amendment does not explicitly require warrants in all situations, but rather prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures. In his view, it is reasonable for officers to enter a home without a warrant if they believe the suspect is inside and may escape or destroy evidence while they are obtaining one. Furthermore, he pointed out that many states allow such entries under their laws, indicating this practice has been widely accepted as reasonable throughout American history.

Opinion written by Justice JPStevens
Decided: Apr 15, 1980
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms