Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Pedersen v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad Company

• 1912 • 229 U.S. 146 • White Court
In the 1912 case of Pedersen v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad Company, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of the railroad company. The plaintiff, Mr. Pedersen, was a worker who suffered injuries while working on an interstate train that was temporarily stationary for repairs within New York state lines but not engaged in interstate commerce at that moment. He sought compensation under federal law - specifically the Employers' Liability Act (1908), which held employers liable for...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief White Court
Term: 1912
Docket: 698
229 U.S. 146
33 S. Ct. 648
57 L. Ed. 1125
1913 U.S. LEXIS 2429
Argued: Jan 14, 1913

Pedersen v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad Company

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the 1912 case of Pedersen v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad Company, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of the railroad company. The plaintiff, Mr. Pedersen, was a worker who suffered injuries while working on an interstate train that was temporarily stationary for repairs within New York state lines but not engaged in interstate commerce at that moment. He sought compensation under federal law - specifically the Employers' Liability Act (1908), which held employers liable for employees' injuries sustained during interstate commerce work. The court found that since Pedersen's injury occurred when he wasn't actively involved in interstate transportation or directly facilitating it at that time and place; his claim didn't fall under this act's jurisdiction despite being employed by an entity generally engaged in such activities. This decision established a precedent limiting federal liability to cases where workers are injured while actually participating or directly aiding in ongoing interstate commerce operations rather than merely being employed by entities conducting such business overall.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Pedersen v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad Company, it was argued that the majority's decision to hold the railroad company liable for damages suffered by an employee who was injured while working on a car located on a side track went against established legal principles. The dissenting justices contended that under common law and federal statutes, employers were not responsible for providing absolute safety to their employees but only had a duty of care in maintaining reasonably safe conditions. They believed that this standard had been met by the railroad company since they provided adequate lighting and warnings about potential dangers associated with moving trains. Furthermore, they pointed out that there was no evidence showing negligence or misconduct from supervisors or other workers which could have contributed to the accident. Therefore, according to them, holding employers accountable for accidents caused solely by employees' own mistakes would set an unfair precedent and place undue burden on businesses.

Opinion written by Justice WVanDevanter
Decided: May 26, 1913
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms