Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Petroleum Exploration, Inc. v. Public Service Commission Et Al.

• 1937 • 304 U.S. 209 • Hughes Court
In the case of Petroleum Exploration, Inc. v. Public Service Commission et al., 1937, the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Public Service Commission (PSC). The dispute arose when Petroleum Exploration, Inc., a Kentucky-based oil company, challenged an order by PSC that required it to obtain a certificate of public convenience and necessity before transporting natural gas across state lines for sale. The company argued that this requirement was unconstitutional as it violated their rights...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Hughes Court
Term: 1937
Docket: 705
304 U.S. 209
58 S. Ct. 834
82 L. Ed. 1294
1938 U.S. LEXIS 1077
Argued: Apr 04, 1938

Petroleum Exploration, Inc. v. Public Service Commission Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Petroleum Exploration, Inc. v. Public Service Commission et al., 1937, the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Public Service Commission (PSC). The dispute arose when Petroleum Exploration, Inc., a Kentucky-based oil company, challenged an order by PSC that required it to obtain a certificate of public convenience and necessity before transporting natural gas across state lines for sale. The company argued that this requirement was unconstitutional as it violated their rights under the Commerce Clause and Due Process Clause of the Constitution. However, after careful consideration, the court upheld PSC's order stating that such regulation was within its power since transportation and sale were part of 'intrastate' commerce which falls under state jurisdiction rather than federal jurisdiction according to existing laws at that time. Therefore, they concluded there was no violation against either clause mentioned by Petroleum Exploration Inc. The ruling underscored states’ authority over intrastate commerce activities while also highlighting how companies must comply with local regulations even if their operations extend beyond one particular state’s borders.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Petroleum Exploration, Inc. v. Public Service Commission et al., Justice McReynolds argued that the majority's decision was a departure from established principles of constitutional law and an unwarranted extension of governmental power over private business operations. He contended that the Ohio statute in question, which allowed state regulation of natural gas production rates, interfered with interstate commerce and violated property rights protected by due process under the Fourteenth Amendment. The justice believed this case represented a dangerous precedent where states could regulate businesses without clear justification or reasonable limits on their authority. Furthermore, he expressed concern about potential negative impacts on industry development and economic growth resulting from such excessive regulatory control.

Opinion written by Justice SFReed
Decided: May 02, 1938
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms