Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Philadelphia & Reading Railway Company v. Di Donato

• 1920 • 256 U.S. 327 • White Court
The U.S. Supreme Court case Philadelphia & Reading Railway Company v. Di Donato in 1920 revolved around a dispute over the liability of an employer for injuries sustained by an employee during work hours. The plaintiff, Di Donato, was injured while working on a construction project for the defendant, Philadelphia & Reading Railway Company (P&RR). He sued P&RR under Pennsylvania's Workmen's Compensation Act and won compensation at both trial court level and state appellate court level. However,...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief White Court
Term: 1920
Docket: 297
256 U.S. 327
41 S. Ct. 516
65 L. Ed. 955
1921 U.S. LEXIS 1605
Argued: Apr 28, 1921

Philadelphia & Reading Railway Company v. Di Donato

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The U.S. Supreme Court case Philadelphia & Reading Railway Company v. Di Donato in 1920 revolved around a dispute over the liability of an employer for injuries sustained by an employee during work hours. The plaintiff, Di Donato, was injured while working on a construction project for the defendant, Philadelphia & Reading Railway Company (P&RR). He sued P&RR under Pennsylvania's Workmen's Compensation Act and won compensation at both trial court level and state appellate court level. However, P&RR appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court arguing that since they were engaged in interstate commerce at the time of injury - building tracks connecting two states - federal law should apply instead of state law which would exempt them from paying compensation as per Federal Employers' Liability Act (FELA). The Supreme Court disagreed with this argument stating that although railroads are instruments of interstate commerce, not all activities performed by railroad employees necessarily constitute such commerce. In this particular case, it held that constructing new railway lines is not part of regular railway operation or maintenance but rather enhancement or expansion activity which falls under intrastate jurisdiction thus making P&RR liable to pay compensation as per Pennsylvania’s laws.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

The dissenting opinion in the case of Philadelphia & Reading Railway Company v. Di Donato argued that the majority's decision to deny compensation for an injured worker was unjust and inconsistent with previous rulings. The dissent emphasized that the railway company had a clear duty to provide safe working conditions for its employees, including Mr. Di Donato, who suffered severe injuries due to negligence on part of his employer. It was pointed out that under Pennsylvania law, employers are required to compensate workers for injuries sustained during their employment regardless of whether they were negligent or not. Therefore, it was argued that denying compensation contradicted both legal precedent and principles of fairness and justice.

Opinion written by Justice JMcKenna
Decided: May 16, 1921
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms