Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin Et Al.

• 1953 • 347 U.S. 672 • Warren Court
In the case of Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin et al., 1953, the U.S Supreme Court ruled that independent producers and gatherers of natural gas were subject to regulation by the Federal Power Commission (FPC) under the Natural Gas Act of 1938. The court held that Congress intended for comprehensive regulation over all aspects of natural gas transportation and sale in interstate commerce, including production and gathering activities typically performed by independent companies like...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Warren Court
Term: 1953
Docket: 280
347 U.S. 672
74 S. Ct. 794
98 L. Ed. 2d 1035
1954 U.S. LEXIS 2620
Argued: Apr 06, 1954

Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin et al., 1953, the U.S Supreme Court ruled that independent producers and gatherers of natural gas were subject to regulation by the Federal Power Commission (FPC) under the Natural Gas Act of 1938. The court held that Congress intended for comprehensive regulation over all aspects of natural gas transportation and sale in interstate commerce, including production and gathering activities typically performed by independent companies like Phillips Petroleum Company. This decision was significant as it expanded federal regulatory authority over a broader range of entities involved in natural gas industry operations than previously recognized.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin, Justice Robert H. Jackson argued that the majority's decision to regulate independent producers of natural gas under the Natural Gas Act was a misinterpretation of Congressional intent and an overreach by federal agencies into state jurisdictional matters. He contended that Congress intended for regulation only in instances where states were unable or unwilling to do so themselves, not as a blanket rule applicable to all interstate commerce related to natural gas production and sale regardless of existing effective state regulations. Furthermore, he expressed concern about potential negative impacts on small businesses due to increased regulatory burdens imposed by this ruling.

Opinion written by Justice SMinton
Decided: Jun 07, 1954
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms