Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Piedmont Power & Light Company v. Town Of Graham Et Al.

• 1919 • 253 U.S. 193 • White Court
The Piedmont Power & Light Company v. Town of Graham et al., 1919, was a case that revolved around the issue of whether or not a municipality could legally purchase and operate an electric power plant without obtaining legislative approval. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Town of Graham, stating that municipalities have the inherent right to own and operate utilities for public use under their police powers granted by state constitutions. This ruling upheld previous decisions which...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief White Court
Term: 1919
Docket: 684
253 U.S. 193
40 S. Ct. 453
64 L. Ed. 855
1920 U.S. LEXIS 1461

Piedmont Power & Light Company v. Town Of Graham Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The Piedmont Power & Light Company v. Town of Graham et al., 1919, was a case that revolved around the issue of whether or not a municipality could legally purchase and operate an electric power plant without obtaining legislative approval. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Town of Graham, stating that municipalities have the inherent right to own and operate utilities for public use under their police powers granted by state constitutions. This ruling upheld previous decisions which recognized this inherent right as long as it did not infringe upon private property rights without due process or just compensation. Furthermore, it established that such municipal operations do not constitute unfair competition with private companies because they are undertaken for public benefit rather than commercial profit.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

The dissenting opinion in the Piedmont Power & Light Company v. Town of Graham case argued that the majority's decision to uphold a North Carolina law, which allowed municipalities to set rates for public utilities, was flawed. The dissenters believed this ruling violated the Fourteenth Amendment by depriving companies of their property without due process of law. They contended that it is not within a state’s power to fix utility rates so low as to be confiscatory and thus destroy or impair the value of private property devoted to public use. Furthermore, they disagreed with how evidence was evaluated in determining whether these rates were indeed too low; they felt there should have been more consideration given towards ensuring just compensation for utility providers.

Opinion written by Justice JHClarke
Decided: May 17, 1920
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms