Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Pittsburgh Locomotive And Car Works v. National Bank Of Keokuk

1876 • 154 U.S. 626 • Waite Court
This case was a dispute between the Pittsburgh Locomotive and Car Works and the National Bank of Keokuk. The Pittsburgh Locomotive and Car Works had sold a locomotive to the National Bank of Keokuk, and the bank had paid for it with a check. The check was dishonored by the bank, and the Pittsburgh Locomotive and Car Works sued for the amount of the check plus interest. The Supreme Court held that the National Bank of Keokuk was liable for the amount of the check plus interest. The Court...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Waite Court
Term: 1876
Docket: 718
154 U.S. 626
14 S. Ct. 1180
24 L. Ed. 270
1877 U.S. LEXIS 1742

Pittsburgh Locomotive And Car Works v. National Bank Of Keokuk

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

This case was a dispute between the Pittsburgh Locomotive and Car Works and the National Bank of Keokuk. The Pittsburgh Locomotive and Car Works had sold a locomotive to the National Bank of Keokuk, and the bank had paid for it with a check. The check was dishonored by the bank, and the Pittsburgh Locomotive and Car Works sued for the amount of the check plus interest. The Supreme Court held that the National Bank of Keokuk was liable for the amount of the check plus interest. The Court reasoned that the bank had accepted the check in good faith and had not been aware of any defect in the check when it was accepted. Therefore, the bank was liable for the amount of the check plus interest. The Court also held that the Pittsburgh Locomotive and Car Works was not entitled to any additional damages, such as attorney's fees or costs, because the bank had not acted in bad faith. The Court reasoned that the bank had acted in good faith and had not been aware of any defect in the check when it was accepted. Therefore, the bank was not liable for any additional damages.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Pittsburgh Locomotive and Car Works v. National Bank of Keokuk, the Supreme Court was asked to decide whether a bank could be held liable for failing to pay out on a check that had been fraudulently altered after it had left the hands of its maker. The majority opinion found in favor of the bank, holding that they were not responsible for any losses due to such alterations as they had no control over them once they were placed into circulation. However, Justice Field dissented from this decision arguing that banks should have some responsibility when it comes to preventing fraudulent checks from being paid out by their institution. He argued that banks should take reasonable steps towards ensuring only valid checks are paid out and if these steps are not taken then liability may lie with them in cases where fraud has occurred.

Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms