Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Planned Parenthood Association Of Kansas City, Missouri, Inc., Et Al. v. Ashcroft, Attorney General Of Missouri, Et Al.

• 1982 • 462 U.S. 476 • Burger Court
The U.S. Supreme Court case Planned Parenthood Association of Kansas City, Missouri, Inc., et al. v. Ashcroft, Attorney General of Missouri, et al., 1982 dealt with the constitutionality of a Missouri statute that imposed restrictions on abortions. The court upheld several provisions in the law including: requiring physicians to perform viability tests on fetuses at or beyond 20 weeks gestation; mandating parental consent for minors seeking an abortion (with a judicial bypass option); and...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Burger Court
Term: 1982
Docket: 81-1255
462 U.S. 476
103 S. Ct. 2517
76 L. Ed. 2d 733
1983 U.S. LEXIS 64
Argued: Nov 30, 1982

Planned Parenthood Association Of Kansas City, Missouri, Inc., Et Al. v. Ashcroft, Attorney General Of Missouri, Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The U.S. Supreme Court case Planned Parenthood Association of Kansas City, Missouri, Inc., et al. v. Ashcroft, Attorney General of Missouri, et al., 1982 dealt with the constitutionality of a Missouri statute that imposed restrictions on abortions. The court upheld several provisions in the law including: requiring physicians to perform viability tests on fetuses at or beyond 20 weeks gestation; mandating parental consent for minors seeking an abortion (with a judicial bypass option); and necessitating written consent from women seeking abortions after being provided detailed information about fetal development and risks associated with abortion procedures. However, it struck down one provision which required all second-trimester abortions to be performed in hospitals rather than clinics due to its undue burden on women's access to safe and legal abortions.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Planned Parenthood Association of Kansas City, Missouri, Inc., v. Ashcroft, Attorney General of Missouri et al., 1982 case, Justice Stevens argued that the state's requirement for a second physician to be present during an abortion procedure was unnecessary and burdensome. He also disagreed with the majority's decision regarding parental consent for minors seeking abortions. According to him, this ruling could potentially infringe upon a minor’s constitutional right to privacy by requiring them to obtain parental or judicial approval before undergoing an abortion procedure. Moreover, he expressed concern over how these restrictions might disproportionately affect low-income women who may not have access to multiple physicians or legal resources necessary in obtaining judicial bypasses around parental consent laws.

Opinion written by Justice LFPowell
Decided: Jun 15, 1983
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms