Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Planters Cotton Oil Co., Inc., Et Al. v. Hopkins, Collector Of Internal Revenue

• 1931 • 286 U.S. 332 • Hughes Court
The U.S. Supreme Court case Planters Cotton Oil Co., Inc., et al. v. Hopkins, Collector of Internal Revenue in 1931 revolved around the issue of tax deductions for losses incurred by a corporation due to the sale or exchange of capital assets under Section 101(b) and (c) of the Revenue Act of 1928. The petitioner, Planters Cotton Oil Company, had sold cottonseed oil futures contracts at a loss during that year and claimed these as ordinary business losses on their income tax return rather than...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Hughes Court
Term: 1931
Docket: 672
286 U.S. 332
52 S. Ct. 509
76 L. Ed. 1135
1932 U.S. LEXIS 608
Argued: Apr 20, 1932

Planters Cotton Oil Co., Inc., Et Al. v. Hopkins, Collector Of Internal Revenue

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The U.S. Supreme Court case Planters Cotton Oil Co., Inc., et al. v. Hopkins, Collector of Internal Revenue in 1931 revolved around the issue of tax deductions for losses incurred by a corporation due to the sale or exchange of capital assets under Section 101(b) and (c) of the Revenue Act of 1928. The petitioner, Planters Cotton Oil Company, had sold cottonseed oil futures contracts at a loss during that year and claimed these as ordinary business losses on their income tax return rather than capital losses which are subject to limitations on deductibility. However, this was disputed by the respondent who argued that such transactions were sales or exchanges of capital assets resulting in capital losses only partially deductible from gross income under section 101(c). The court ruled in favor of Hopkins stating that these transactions constituted sales or exchanges within meaning given those terms by Congress when it enacted sections defining net income and providing for deduction therefrom certain percentages only where loss resulted from sale or exchange.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Planters Cotton Oil Co., Inc. v. Hopkins, it was argued that the majority's interpretation of the Revenue Act of 1918 was incorrect and overly broad. The dissenting justices believed that Congress did not intend to tax as income any increase in value of property held by a corporation until such time as this increase is realized through sale or other disposition. They felt that unrealized appreciation should not be considered taxable income under existing law because it does not represent an actual gain but merely a potential one, which may never materialize due to market fluctuations or other factors beyond control of the taxpayer. Furthermore, they contended that taxing unrealized gains would create undue hardship on corporations and could potentially lead to insolvency if these entities were required to pay taxes on assets whose value had increased but which they still owned and thus could not use to generate cash needed for tax payments.

Opinion written by Justice BNCardozo
Decided: May 16, 1932
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms