Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

City Of Pleasant Grove v. United States

• 1986 • 479 U.S. 462 • Rehnquist Court
In the 1986 case City of Pleasant Grove v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled that a city's at-large electoral system was in violation of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act due to its discriminatory effect on black voters. The city of Pleasant Grove, Alabama had an at-large voting system where all voters could vote for all members of the city council. However, this resulted in no African American representation despite making up about 62% percent population because white residents...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Rehnquist Court
Term: 1986
Docket: 85-1244
479 U.S. 462
107 S. Ct. 794
93 L. Ed. 2d 866
1987 U.S. LEXIS 415
Argued: Dec 10, 1986

City Of Pleasant Grove v. United States

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the 1986 case City of Pleasant Grove v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled that a city's at-large electoral system was in violation of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act due to its discriminatory effect on black voters. The city of Pleasant Grove, Alabama had an at-large voting system where all voters could vote for all members of the city council. However, this resulted in no African American representation despite making up about 62% percent population because white residents consistently voted as a bloc to defeat black candidates. The court found that under these circumstances, such an electoral system denied African Americans equal opportunity "to participate in the political process and to elect representatives of their choice," violating federal law.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for CITY OF PLEASANT GROVE v. UNITED STATES, 1986, Justice Stevens argued that the majority's decision was inconsistent with previous rulings on voting rights cases. He contended that the city of Pleasant Grove had violated Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act by diluting minority votes through its at-large electoral system and thus preventing black citizens from having an equal opportunity to participate in political processes. The justice also disagreed with the majority's view about what constitutes a violation under Section 2, arguing it should not be limited to instances where minorities have less opportunity than whites to elect representatives of their choice but should include any practice or procedure which results in unequal access to any aspect of a state’s electoral process.

Opinion written by Justice BRWhite
Decided: Jan 21, 1987
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcript
Argued: Oct 05, 2026
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms