Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Powers v. United States

• 1911 • 223 U.S. 303 • White Court
In the Powers v. United States case of 1911, the Supreme Court ruled on a matter concerning jury selection in federal courts. The defendant, Mr. Powers, was convicted for conspiracy to defraud the government by using mail and argued that his conviction should be overturned because African Americans were excluded from his grand jury panel. He claimed this exclusion violated his rights under both statutory law and constitutional law (the Fourteenth Amendment). However, he himself was not African...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief White Court
Term: 1911
Docket: 152
223 U.S. 303
32 S. Ct. 281
56 L. Ed. 448
1912 U.S. LEXIS 2236
Argued: Jan 22, 1912

Powers v. United States

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the Powers v. United States case of 1911, the Supreme Court ruled on a matter concerning jury selection in federal courts. The defendant, Mr. Powers, was convicted for conspiracy to defraud the government by using mail and argued that his conviction should be overturned because African Americans were excluded from his grand jury panel. He claimed this exclusion violated his rights under both statutory law and constitutional law (the Fourteenth Amendment). However, he himself was not African American but white. The court held that a white defendant has no standing to challenge an indictment based on racial discrimination in grand jury selection unless it can be shown that there is also prejudice against whites or if it violates another right such as due process clause of Fifth Amendment or equal protection clause of Fourteenth Amendment.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Powers v. United States, Justice Harlan argued that the majority's decision to uphold a federal law prohibiting lotteries was an overreach of Congress' power under the Commerce Clause. He contended that while Congress has authority to regulate interstate commerce, it does not have unlimited power to prohibit items from being transported across state lines simply because they are deemed immoral or harmful by some standards. He asserted this would give Congress too much discretion in determining what constitutes morality and could lead to potential abuses of power. Furthermore, he believed such matters should be left up to individual states rather than decided at a federal level.

Opinion written by Justice WRDay
Decided: Feb 19, 1912
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms