Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Public Service Commission Of The State Of New York v. Federal Power Commission Et Al.

• 1959 • 361 U.S. 195 • Warren Court
In the 1959 case of Public Service Commission of the State of New York v. Federal Power Commission, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Federal Power Commission (FPC). The issue at hand was whether or not FPC had jurisdiction over sales for resale by a pipeline company to local distribution companies within a single state. The court held that such transactions were indeed subject to federal regulation under Natural Gas Act's definition of "interstate commerce". This decision clarified and...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Warren Court
Term: 1959
Docket: 459
361 U.S. 195
80 S. Ct. 292
4 L. Ed. 2d 237
1959 U.S. LEXIS 3

Public Service Commission Of The State Of New York v. Federal Power Commission Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the 1959 case of Public Service Commission of the State of New York v. Federal Power Commission, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Federal Power Commission (FPC). The issue at hand was whether or not FPC had jurisdiction over sales for resale by a pipeline company to local distribution companies within a single state. The court held that such transactions were indeed subject to federal regulation under Natural Gas Act's definition of "interstate commerce". This decision clarified and expanded upon previous rulings regarding interstate commerce and energy regulation, confirming that even when gas is sold within one state, if it has traveled through interstate pipelines before reaching its final destination, then it falls under federal jurisdiction.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Public Service Commission of the State of New York v. Federal Power Commission, it was argued that the majority's decision to uphold federal jurisdiction over wholesale electricity rates in interstate commerce could potentially undermine state regulatory authority and disrupt local utility operations. The dissenters contended that states should retain control over their own utilities as they are better equipped to understand and manage local conditions and needs. They also expressed concern about potential rate increases resulting from this shift in power, which could negatively impact consumers. Furthermore, they questioned whether Congress intended for such a broad interpretation of federal powers under the Natural Gas Act when it was enacted.

Opinion written by Justice
Decided: Dec 14, 1959
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms