Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Public Service Commission Of Puerto Rico v. Havemeyer Et Al.

• 1935 • 296 U.S. 506 • Hughes Court
The case of Public Service Commission of Puerto Rico v. Havemeyer et al., 1935, revolved around the issue of whether or not the Public Service Commission in Puerto Rico had jurisdiction over a foreign corporation that was operating on the island. The company in question, American Railroad Company of Porto Rico, was incorporated under New Jersey law but conducted all its business operations within Puerto Rico. The Supreme Court ruled that even though it is a foreign corporation, since it...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Hughes Court
Term: 1935
Docket: 115
296 U.S. 506
56 S. Ct. 360
80 L. Ed. 357
1936 U.S. LEXIS 483
Argued: Dec 12, 1935

Public Service Commission Of Puerto Rico v. Havemeyer Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The case of Public Service Commission of Puerto Rico v. Havemeyer et al., 1935, revolved around the issue of whether or not the Public Service Commission in Puerto Rico had jurisdiction over a foreign corporation that was operating on the island. The company in question, American Railroad Company of Porto Rico, was incorporated under New Jersey law but conducted all its business operations within Puerto Rico. The Supreme Court ruled that even though it is a foreign corporation, since it operates solely within Puerto Rican territory and serves local communities there, it falls under the regulatory authority of the Public Service Commission. This decision affirmed that territorial governments have power to regulate businesses operating exclusively within their borders regardless if they are domestic or foreign corporations.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Public Service Commission of Puerto Rico v. Havemeyer, Justice Stone argued that the majority's decision was a misinterpretation of both the Jones Act and prior court rulings. He contended that Congress had intended to grant Puerto Rico full sovereignty over local matters when it passed the Jones Act in 1917, which included control over public utilities like those at issue in this case. Furthermore, he pointed out that previous Supreme Court decisions had upheld Puerto Rico's right to regulate its own affairs without interference from federal courts unless there was a clear conflict with U.S law or constitutional rights were being violated. In his view, neither condition applied here; therefore, he believed that the lower court should not have intervened in what was essentially a dispute between a local government agency and private businesses operating within its jurisdiction.

Opinion written by Justice PButler
Decided: Jan 06, 1936
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms