Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Public Service Commission Of Utah Et Al. v. United States Et Al.

• 1957 • 356 U.S. 421 • Warren Court
In the case of Public Service Commission of Utah et al. v. United States et al., 1957, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the federal government's right to regulate interstate commerce over state rights. The dispute arose when a trucking company operating between states was granted permission by the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) to extend its operations within Utah, despite objections from local carriers and Utah's Public Service Commission who argued that it would harm their business....Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Warren Court
Term: 1957
Docket: 15
356 U.S. 421
78 S. Ct. 796
2 L. Ed. 2d 886
1958 U.S. LEXIS 1784
Argued: Dec 09, 1957

Public Service Commission Of Utah Et Al. v. United States Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Public Service Commission of Utah et al. v. United States et al., 1957, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the federal government's right to regulate interstate commerce over state rights. The dispute arose when a trucking company operating between states was granted permission by the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) to extend its operations within Utah, despite objections from local carriers and Utah's Public Service Commission who argued that it would harm their business. The State commission sued on grounds that ICC had not sufficiently considered interests of intrastate commerce before granting permission for expansion but lost at both District and Appeals court levels. The Supreme Court upheld these decisions stating that while ICC must consider effects on intrastate service when making decisions about interstate services, they are not required to provide detailed findings or conclusions regarding this consideration unless there is substantial evidence suggesting potential harm to intrastate service which wasn't found in this case.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Public Service Commission of Utah et al. v. United States et al., Justice Frankfurter argued that the majority's decision was an overreach of federal power and a violation of states' rights to regulate their own commerce. He contended that the Interstate Commerce Act did not grant such broad authority to the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) as interpreted by his colleagues, especially when it came to intrastate transportation matters traditionally under state jurisdiction. The justice believed this case represented an unwarranted intrusion into local affairs, undermining principles of federalism and disrupting established regulatory frameworks without sufficient justification or legal basis in statute or precedent. Furthermore, he expressed concern about potential negative impacts on local businesses due to increased competition from interstate carriers now able to operate within state borders under ICC regulation rather than state control.

Opinion written by Justice TCClark
Decided: May 19, 1958
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms