Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Public Service Commission Et Al. v. Brashear Freight Lines, Inc., Et Al.

• 1938 • 306 U.S. 204 • Hughes Court
The U.S. Supreme Court case Public Service Commission et al. v. Brashear Freight Lines, Inc., et al., 1938, revolved around the issue of whether a state could regulate interstate commerce in relation to motor carriers operating within its borders without violating the Commerce Clause of the Constitution. The Public Service Commission (PSC) of Missouri sought to enforce regulations on Brashear Freight Lines, an interstate trucking company that operated within and outside Missouri's boundaries....Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Hughes Court
Term: 1938
Docket: 605
306 U.S. 204
59 S. Ct. 480
83 L. Ed. 608
1939 U.S. LEXIS 814

Public Service Commission Et Al. v. Brashear Freight Lines, Inc., Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The U.S. Supreme Court case Public Service Commission et al. v. Brashear Freight Lines, Inc., et al., 1938, revolved around the issue of whether a state could regulate interstate commerce in relation to motor carriers operating within its borders without violating the Commerce Clause of the Constitution. The Public Service Commission (PSC) of Missouri sought to enforce regulations on Brashear Freight Lines, an interstate trucking company that operated within and outside Missouri's boundaries. However, Brashear argued that such regulation was unconstitutional as it interfered with their ability to conduct business across state lines freely. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of PSC stating that states have authority over highways and can therefore impose reasonable regulations on companies using them for commercial purposes even if they are involved in interstate commerce - provided these rules do not discriminate against or unduly burden interstate commerce. This decision affirmed states' rights to regulate local aspects of national businesses while also maintaining federal supremacy over broader issues related to trade between states.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

The dissenting opinion in the case of Public Service Commission et al. v. Brashear Freight Lines, Inc., et al., argued that the majority's decision to allow interstate trucking companies to bypass state regulations was a misinterpretation of the Federal Motor Carrier Act and an overreach of federal power. The dissenters believed that states should retain their authority to regulate local aspects of interstate commerce when it does not interfere with national uniformity or efficiency. They contended that allowing states this control would protect them from economic harm caused by unregulated competition and ensure fair treatment for all businesses operating within their borders. Furthermore, they expressed concern about potential negative impacts on public safety due to lack of oversight if state regulatory powers were diminished.

Opinion written by Justice
Decided: Feb 13, 1939
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms