Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Qualitex Company v. Jacobson Products Company, Inc.

• 1994 • 514 U.S. 159 • Rehnquist Court
In the case of Qualitex Company v. Jacobson Products Company, Inc., the U.S Supreme Court ruled that a color could be registered as a trademark under the Federal Trademark Act (Lanham Act). The dispute arose when Qualitex started using a green-gold color for its dry cleaning press pads in 1957 and subsequently sued Jacobson Products for using the same color on their press pads, alleging trademark infringement. The court held that it was possible to meet all requirements set forth by Lanham Act...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Rehnquist Court
Term: 1994
Docket: 93-1577
514 U.S. 159
115 S. Ct. 1300
131 L. Ed. 2d 248
1995 U.S. LEXIS 2408
Argued: Jan 09, 1995

Qualitex Company v. Jacobson Products Company, Inc.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Qualitex Company v. Jacobson Products Company, Inc., the U.S Supreme Court ruled that a color could be registered as a trademark under the Federal Trademark Act (Lanham Act). The dispute arose when Qualitex started using a green-gold color for its dry cleaning press pads in 1957 and subsequently sued Jacobson Products for using the same color on their press pads, alleging trademark infringement. The court held that it was possible to meet all requirements set forth by Lanham Act with respect to colors; therefore, they can serve as trademarks if used consistently and exclusively by one company over time such that consumers associate them with certain goods or services from this particular source. This decision marked an important development in intellectual property law because it expanded protection beyond traditional symbols and words to include distinctive non-verbal elements like colors.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Qualitex Company v. Jacobson Products Company, Inc., Justice Scalia argued that color alone should not be eligible for trademark protection under the Lanham Act. He contended that while a particular shade of green-gold used in dry cleaning pads might serve to identify Qualitex's goods, it did not meet the statutory definition of a trademark as it was not a "symbol" or "device". Furthermore, he expressed concern about potential negative implications on competition and innovation if colors were allowed to be monopolized through trademarks. In his view, granting such exclusive rights could limit available options for other businesses in similar industries and stifle creativity. Thus, he disagreed with majority’s decision which extended protection to single-color trademarks under certain conditions.

Opinion written by Justice SGBreyer
Decided: Mar 28, 1995
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcript
Argued: Oct 05, 2026
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms