Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Ramah Navajo School Board, Inc., Et Al. v. Bureau Of Revenue Of New Mexico

• 1981 • 458 U.S. 832 • Burger Court
In the case of Ramah Navajo School Board, Inc. v. Bureau of Revenue of New Mexico (1981), the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Ramah Navajo School Board, stating that a state could not impose taxes on a federal contractor operating within an Indian reservation without express authorization from Congress. The school board had contracted with non-Indian construction companies to build schools on tribal land and was subsequently taxed by New Mexico's Bureau of Revenue for gross receipts tax...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Burger Court
Term: 1981
Docket: 80-2162
458 U.S. 832
102 S. Ct. 3394
73 L. Ed. 2d 1174
1982 U.S. LEXIS 50
Argued: Apr 28, 1982

Ramah Navajo School Board, Inc., Et Al. v. Bureau Of Revenue Of New Mexico

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Ramah Navajo School Board, Inc. v. Bureau of Revenue of New Mexico (1981), the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Ramah Navajo School Board, stating that a state could not impose taxes on a federal contractor operating within an Indian reservation without express authorization from Congress. The school board had contracted with non-Indian construction companies to build schools on tribal land and was subsequently taxed by New Mexico's Bureau of Revenue for gross receipts tax related to these contracts. The court held that this taxation interfered with federal policy towards Native American tribes and their sovereignty rights over their reservations as established by treaties and statutes.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Ramah Navajo School Board, Inc. v. Bureau of Revenue of New Mexico, Justice White disagreed with the majority's interpretation that federal law preempts state taxation on a non-Indian contractor’s gross receipts from construction projects on Indian reservations. He argued that there was no explicit congressional intent to preempt such state taxes and pointed out that Congress had not provided any alternative source of revenue for states in lieu of these taxes. Furthermore, he contended that this decision would unfairly burden states by depriving them of tax revenues without clear justification or compensation while benefiting private contractors who could now operate tax-free in Indian territories.

Opinion written by Justice TMarshall
Decided: Jul 02, 1982
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcript
Argued: Oct 05, 2026
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms