Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Reagan v. Mercantile Trust Company

• 1893 • 154 U.S. 413 • Fuller Court
The Reagan v. Mercantile Trust Company case in 1893 revolved around the constitutionality of a Texas law that regulated railroad freight rates. The state's Railroad Commission, headed by John H. Reagan, set maximum charges for transporting goods and passengers within Texas borders. However, several railroads represented by the Mercantile Trust Company challenged this law on grounds that it violated their Fourteenth Amendment rights to due process and equal protection under the Constitution...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Fuller Court
Term: 1893
Docket: 1167
154 U.S. 413
14 S. Ct. 1060
38 L. Ed. 1028
1894 U.S. LEXIS 2237

Reagan v. Mercantile Trust Company

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The Reagan v. Mercantile Trust Company case in 1893 revolved around the constitutionality of a Texas law that regulated railroad freight rates. The state's Railroad Commission, headed by John H. Reagan, set maximum charges for transporting goods and passengers within Texas borders. However, several railroads represented by the Mercantile Trust Company challenged this law on grounds that it violated their Fourteenth Amendment rights to due process and equal protection under the Constitution because it did not allow them to charge what they deemed fair prices for their services. The U.S Supreme Court ruled against Reagan and upheld the railroads' challenge, stating that while states have power to regulate businesses serving public interests such as railroads; any regulation must be reasonable and cannot result in confiscation of property or violation of constitutional rights - which includes earning a fair return on investment for providing these services. This ruling was significant as it established limits on state regulatory powers over private industries serving public interests; emphasizing balance between protecting consumer welfare through price controls versus safeguarding business owners' constitutional rights to earn reasonable profits from their investments.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Reagan v. Mercantile Trust Company, Justice Brewer argued that the Texas legislature had no authority to reduce rates set by private railroad companies without providing compensation. He contended that such action violated the Fourteenth Amendment's due process clause and constituted a taking of property without just compensation. Brewer believed that while states have power to regulate industries within their borders, they cannot arbitrarily interfere with private contracts or destroy value in privately owned businesses under guise of regulation. He maintained that railroads were not public utilities but rather corporations engaged in commerce and thus entitled to protection from arbitrary state interference under both federal constitution and common law principles protecting contractual rights.

Opinion written by Justice DJBrewer
Decided: May 26, 1894
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms