Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Regan, Secretary Of The Treasury, Et Al. v. Taxation With Representation Of Washington

• 1982 • 461 U.S. 540 • Burger Court
In the 1982 case Regan, Secretary of Treasury, et al. v. Taxation with Representation of Washington (TWR), the U.S Supreme Court ruled that Congress can constitutionally limit tax deductions for lobbying expenses to veterans' organizations without violating First Amendment rights. TWR, a non-profit organization dedicated to promoting public interest in federal taxation issues, challenged a provision in the Internal Revenue Code which denied them tax-deductible contributions because they engaged...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Burger Court
Term: 1982
Docket: 81-2338
461 U.S. 540
103 S. Ct. 1997
76 L. Ed. 2d 129
1983 U.S. LEXIS 33
Argued: Mar 22, 1983

Regan, Secretary Of The Treasury, Et Al. v. Taxation With Representation Of Washington

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the 1982 case Regan, Secretary of Treasury, et al. v. Taxation with Representation of Washington (TWR), the U.S Supreme Court ruled that Congress can constitutionally limit tax deductions for lobbying expenses to veterans' organizations without violating First Amendment rights. TWR, a non-profit organization dedicated to promoting public interest in federal taxation issues, challenged a provision in the Internal Revenue Code which denied them tax-deductible contributions because they engaged in substantial lobbying activities. The court held that there was no violation as Congress did not inhibit TWR from exercising its freedom of speech or prevent it from lobbying; rather it simply chose not to subsidize such activities through providing tax benefits.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion of Regan v. Taxation with Representation of Washington, Justice Blackmun argued that the majority's decision was a violation of First Amendment rights. He contended that by denying tax-exempt status to organizations engaged in substantial lobbying activities, it effectively limited their ability to express political views and influence legislation. Furthermore, he disagreed with the majority's assertion that Congress had not infringed upon these groups' freedom of speech because they could still create separate entities for lobbying purposes; instead, he believed this created unnecessary financial burdens and administrative complexities. Finally, Blackmun expressed concern over potential governmental manipulation or bias in determining what constituted "substantial" lobbying activity.

Opinion written by Justice WHRehnquist
Decided: May 23, 1983
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcript
Argued: Oct 05, 2026
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms