Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Regents Of The University System Of Georgia v. Carroll Et Al.

• 1949 • 338 U.S. 586 • Vinson Court
In the case of Regents of the University System of Georgia v. Carroll et al., 1949, the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of three African-American students who were denied admission to a white-only university due to their race. The court held that this was a violation of their Fourteenth Amendment rights which guarantees equal protection under law and prohibits states from denying any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection under law. This decision marked an important step towards...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Vinson Court
Term: 1949
Docket: 83
338 U.S. 586
70 S. Ct. 370
94 L. Ed. 2d 363
1950 U.S. LEXIS 2545
Argued: Dec 09, 1949

Regents Of The University System Of Georgia v. Carroll Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Regents of the University System of Georgia v. Carroll et al., 1949, the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of three African-American students who were denied admission to a white-only university due to their race. The court held that this was a violation of their Fourteenth Amendment rights which guarantees equal protection under law and prohibits states from denying any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection under law. This decision marked an important step towards ending racial segregation in public education institutions across America.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Regents of the University System of Georgia v. Carroll et al., Justice Robert H. Jackson disagreed with the majority's decision to uphold a state law that allowed public universities to deny admission based on race or color. He argued that this was in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment, which guarantees equal protection under the law and prohibits states from denying any person within their jurisdiction these rights without due process. Jackson contended that education is not merely a privilege granted by states but rather an essential right necessary for effective participation in modern society and democracy, thus it should be equally accessible regardless of race or color. Furthermore, he criticized segregation as inherently unequal because it stigmatizes those who are segregated and creates feelings of inferiority among them.

Opinion written by Justice SFReed
Decided: Feb 06, 1950
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms