Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Reynolds v. United States

• 1878 • 98 U.S. 145 • Waite Court
Reynolds v. United States was a Supreme Court case that addressed the issue of religious freedom. The case involved George Reynolds, a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, who was convicted of bigamy in violation of a federal law. Reynolds argued that his conviction violated his First Amendment right to the free exercise of religion. The Supreme Court rejected Reynolds' argument, ruling that the federal law was constitutional and that the government had a legitimate...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Waite Court
Term: 1878
Docket: 180
98 U.S. 145
25 L. Ed. 244
1878 U.S. LEXIS 1374
Argued: Nov 14, 1878

Reynolds v. United States

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

Reynolds v. United States was a Supreme Court case that addressed the issue of religious freedom. The case involved George Reynolds, a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, who was convicted of bigamy in violation of a federal law. Reynolds argued that his conviction violated his First Amendment right to the free exercise of religion. The Supreme Court rejected Reynolds' argument, ruling that the federal law was constitutional and that the government had a legitimate interest in regulating marriage. The Court held that the First Amendment did not protect religious practices that violated the law. The Court also noted that the government had a legitimate interest in protecting the institution of marriage and that the law was not intended to target any particular religion. The Court's decision in Reynolds v. United States established the principle that the government could regulate religious practices that violated the law. The decision also established the principle that the government could regulate religious practices that were seen as contrary to public morality. The decision has been cited in numerous subsequent cases involving the free exercise of religion.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

Justice Field delivered the dissenting opinion in Reynolds v. United States, arguing that religious belief should not be a factor when determining whether or not an act is criminal. He argued that Congress had no authority to pass laws regulating religious beliefs and practices, as this would violate the First Amendment of the Constitution which states “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion”. Justice Field further stated that while it was true polygamy was contrary to public policy, it did not necessarily follow that such behavior could be made illegal by Congress simply because it violated public morality or social order. As such, he concluded that any attempt by Congress to regulate religious beliefs and practices through legislation would constitute a violation of both the letter and spirit of the Constitution.

Opinion written by Justice MRWaite
Decided: Jan 06, 1879
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms