Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Thomas C. Rockhill, Wade T. Smith, And William P. Rockhill, Plaintiffs, v. Robert Hanna, Asa B. Strong, Edward Heizer, Aaron Aldridge, Robert B. Hanna, David Shields, Thomas Johnson, Jeremiah Johnson, And George Bruce

1853 • 56 U.S. 189 • Taney Court
This Supreme Court case involved Thomas C. Rockhill, Wade T. Smith, and William P. Rockhill (plaintiffs) suing Robert Hanna, Asa B. Strong, Edward Heizer, Aaron Aldridge, Robert B. Hanna David Shields Thomas Johnson Jeremiah Johnson and George Bruce (defendants). The plaintiffs sought to recover damages for the defendants’ alleged trespass on their land in Missouri by cutting down trees without permission or legal authority from the state of Missouri or any other person having a right to grant...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Taney Court
Term: 1853
56 U.S. 189
14 L. Ed. 656
1853 U.S. LEXIS 279

Thomas C. Rockhill, Wade T. Smith, And William P. Rockhill, Plaintiffs, v. Robert Hanna, Asa B. Strong, Edward Heizer, Aaron Aldridge, Robert B. Hanna, David Shields, Thomas Johnson, Jeremiah Johnson, And George Bruce

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

This Supreme Court case involved Thomas C. Rockhill, Wade T. Smith, and William P. Rockhill (plaintiffs) suing Robert Hanna, Asa B. Strong, Edward Heizer, Aaron Aldridge, Robert B. Hanna David Shields Thomas Johnson Jeremiah Johnson and George Bruce (defendants). The plaintiffs sought to recover damages for the defendants’ alleged trespass on their land in Missouri by cutting down trees without permission or legal authority from the state of Missouri or any other person having a right to grant such permission or authority at that time. The court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs and awarded them $2 per tree cut down as compensation for their losses due to this illegal activity by the defendants on their property without proper authorization from either themselves or anyone else with a valid claim over it at that time

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion of Thomas C. Rockhill, Wade T. Smith, and William P. Rockhill v Robert Hanna et al., Justice McLean argued that the plaintiffs had failed to prove their case for title to a tract of land in Missouri by clear and satisfactory evidence as required by law. He further stated that even if they had done so, it would be impossible for them to recover because the defendants were protected under an act passed by Congress which granted pre-emption rights on certain lands in Missouri including this particular tract at issue here. Furthermore, he noted that since these pre-emption rights were given before any claim was made or established against them by either party involved in this suit then those rights could not be taken away from them without due process of law being followed first - something which did not happen here according to him. Finally, he concluded his dissent with a statement saying “I am therefore constrained to hold that no right has been acquired under the laws of Missouri; nor can any such right be enforced against these defendants” thus denying relief for the plaintiffs who brought forth this action seeking title over said property

Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms