Questions presented
SCOTUS records, cert granted 6 Nov 2015
Whether the Religious Freedom Restoration Act ("RFRA'') allows the Government to force objecting religious nonprofit organizations to violate their beliefs by offering health plans with "seamless" access to coverage for contraceptives, abortifacients, and sterilization.
Opinion summary
Etalia.ai summary of the majority opinion
The case involved a challenge by the Roman Catholic Archbishop of Washington against provisions in the Affordable Care Act (ACA) that required employers to provide insurance coverage for contraceptives. The plaintiffs argued that this mandate violated their religious freedoms under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA). They contended that even with an accommodation allowing them to opt-out directly, they were still complicit in providing contraception indirectly through third-party insurers. The Supreme Court was asked to consider whether these accommodations sufficiently protected religious organizations' rights or if they imposed a substantial burden on their exercise of religion.
Opinion of the Court
Decided 16 May 2016 · Official report