Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Rosewell, Treasurer Of Cook County, Illinois, Et Al. v. Lasalle National Bank, Trustee

• 1980 • 450 U.S. 503 • Burger Court
In the 1980 case of Rosewell v. LaSalle National Bank, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of Cook County, Illinois. The issue at hand was whether a state tax system that required taxpayers to pay their taxes before they could challenge them in court violated due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment. The LaSalle National Bank argued it did, as it forced taxpayers to essentially lend money to the government without interest while waiting for their legal challenges to be resolved. The...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Burger Court
Term: 1980
Docket: 79-1157
450 U.S. 503
101 S. Ct. 1221
67 L. Ed. 2d 464
1981 U.S. LEXIS 8
Argued: Nov 10, 1980

Rosewell, Treasurer Of Cook County, Illinois, Et Al. v. Lasalle National Bank, Trustee

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the 1980 case of Rosewell v. LaSalle National Bank, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of Cook County, Illinois. The issue at hand was whether a state tax system that required taxpayers to pay their taxes before they could challenge them in court violated due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment. The LaSalle National Bank argued it did, as it forced taxpayers to essentially lend money to the government without interest while waiting for their legal challenges to be resolved. The Supreme Court disagreed with this argument and upheld Illinois' "pay first, litigate later" system by a vote of 6-3. It found that since there were adequate procedures available for challenging tax assessments (including an appeal process), and because any delay in receiving refunds was not unreasonable or caused by state action but rather by judicial backlog, there was no violation of due process rights.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Rosewell v. LaSalle National Bank, Justice William J. Brennan Jr., joined by Justices Potter Stewart and Thurgood Marshall, argued that the majority's decision to uphold Illinois' property tax system was inconsistent with previous Supreme Court rulings on due process rights. They contended that a delay of up to two years before taxpayers could challenge their assessments in court effectively denied them a meaningful opportunity to be heard. The justices also criticized the majority for ignoring evidence suggesting that Cook County's assessment procedures were fundamentally flawed and systematically biased against certain types of properties. Furthermore, they disagreed with the majority’s view that state courts should have final say over federal constitutional questions involving state taxation schemes.

Opinion written by Justice WJBrennan
Decided: Mar 24, 1981
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcript
Argued: Oct 05, 2026
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms