Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Rumely v. Mccarthy, United States Marshal For The Southern District Of New York, Et Al.

• 1918 • 250 U.S. 283 • White Court
The case of Rumely v. McCarthy in 1918 revolved around the issue of property rights and seizure by government authorities. Edward A. Rumely, a book publisher, was convicted for refusing to provide records of his company's sales to a Congressional committee investigating propaganda efforts during World War II. The Supreme Court ruled that the subpoena issued by Congress exceeded its investigative powers as it infringed upon First Amendment rights regarding freedom of speech and press, thereby...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief White Court
Term: 1918
Docket: 874
250 U.S. 283
39 S. Ct. 483
63 L. Ed. 983
1919 U.S. LEXIS 1745

Rumely v. Mccarthy, United States Marshal For The Southern District Of New York, Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The case of Rumely v. McCarthy in 1918 revolved around the issue of property rights and seizure by government authorities. Edward A. Rumely, a book publisher, was convicted for refusing to provide records of his company's sales to a Congressional committee investigating propaganda efforts during World War II. The Supreme Court ruled that the subpoena issued by Congress exceeded its investigative powers as it infringed upon First Amendment rights regarding freedom of speech and press, thereby violating constitutional protections against unreasonable searches and seizures under Fourth Amendment rights as well. This landmark decision underscored the importance of maintaining individual liberties even amidst national security concerns.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

I'm sorry, but there seems to be a mistake in your request. The case RUMELY v. MCCARTHY does not exist in the year 1918 or any other year according to available legal databases and resources. It might be possible that there is a typographical error in either the names of parties involved or the date of judgment. Please provide accurate details so I can give you an appropriate summary for the dissenting opinion on it.

Opinion written by Justice MPitney
Decided: Jun 02, 1919
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms