Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Runyon Et Ux., Dba Bobbe's School v. Mccrary Et Al.

• 1975 • 427 U.S. 160 • Burger Court
In the 1975 case Runyon et ux., dba Bobbe's School v. McCrary et al., the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that private schools could not discriminate based on race in their admissions policies, even if they did not receive federal funding. The case involved two African American students who were denied admission to a private school solely because of their race. The court held that this was a violation of Section 1981 of Title 42, which prohibits racial discrimination in making and enforcing contracts,...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Burger Court
Term: 1975
Docket: 75-62
427 U.S. 160
96 S. Ct. 2586
49 L. Ed. 2d 415
1976 U.S. LEXIS 7
Argued: Apr 26, 1976

Runyon Et Ux., Dba Bobbe's School v. Mccrary Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the 1975 case Runyon et ux., dba Bobbe's School v. McCrary et al., the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that private schools could not discriminate based on race in their admissions policies, even if they did not receive federal funding. The case involved two African American students who were denied admission to a private school solely because of their race. The court held that this was a violation of Section 1981 of Title 42, which prohibits racial discrimination in making and enforcing contracts, including those for services such as education. This decision extended civil rights protections beyond public institutions to include privately owned entities.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Runyon et ux., DBA Bobbe's School v. McCrary et al., Justice William Rehnquist argued that the majority misinterpreted Section 1981 of the Civil Rights Act, which was intended to protect against racial discrimination in contractual relationships. He contended that private schools should retain their right to choose students based on any criteria they see fit, including race, as long as it does not involve state action or federal funding. According to him, this case did not involve a violation of equal protection under law because it concerned private actions rather than state-imposed segregation. Furthermore, he believed that Congress never intended Section 1981 to apply broadly and interfere with private decisions about who can attend a school; instead its purpose was more narrow - ensuring African Americans had same legal capacity as whites in making contracts and suing for enforcement.

Opinion written by Justice PStewart
Decided: Jun 25, 1976
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms