Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Schley v. Pullman Car Company

• 1886 • 120 U.S. 575 • Waite Court
In Schley v. Pullman Car Company, the Supreme Court of the United States was asked to decide whether a contract between the Pullman Car Company and the Schley Brothers was valid. The Schley Brothers had contracted with the Pullman Car Company to build a railroad car for the company. The contract stated that the Schley Brothers would be paid a certain amount of money for the car, but the Pullman Car Company refused to pay the full amount. The Schley Brothers sued the Pullman Car Company for...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Waite Court
Term: 1886
Docket: 1113
120 U.S. 575
7 S. Ct. 730
30 L. Ed. 789
1887 U.S. LEXIS 2002

Schley v. Pullman Car Company

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In Schley v. Pullman Car Company, the Supreme Court of the United States was asked to decide whether a contract between the Pullman Car Company and the Schley Brothers was valid. The Schley Brothers had contracted with the Pullman Car Company to build a railroad car for the company. The contract stated that the Schley Brothers would be paid a certain amount of money for the car, but the Pullman Car Company refused to pay the full amount. The Schley Brothers sued the Pullman Car Company for breach of contract. The Supreme Court held that the contract between the Schley Brothers and the Pullman Car Company was valid and enforceable. The Court found that the Pullman Car Company had breached the contract by refusing to pay the full amount due to the Schley Brothers. The Court also held that the Schley Brothers were entitled to damages for the breach of contract. The Court's decision in Schley v. Pullman Car Company established that contracts are binding and enforceable, and that parties who breach contracts are liable for damages. This decision has been cited in numerous cases since then, and it remains an important precedent in contract law.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

Justice Field delivered the dissenting opinion in Schley v. Pullman Car Company, arguing that the majority had misinterpreted the contract between Schley and Pullman. He argued that under California law, which governed this case, a party could not be held liable for damages if they were unaware of any breach of contract by another party. In this instance, he believed it was clear from both parties' testimony that neither knew about or intended to violate their agreement with each other; thus no liability should have been imposed on either side. Furthermore, Justice Field noted that even if one did assume there was a breach of contract here - as the majority had done - then only nominal damages would be appropriate since neither party suffered any actual harm due to its violation. As such, he concluded his dissent by urging reversal of the lower court's decision and dismissal of all claims against both parties without prejudice or costs being awarded to either side.

Opinion written by Justice JHarlan(1)
Decided: Mar 07, 1887
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms