Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Scott County Macadamized Road Company v. State Of Missouri Ex Rel. Hines, Prosecuting Attorney Of Cape Girardeau County

• 1909 • 215 U.S. 336 • Fuller Court
The Scott County Macadamized Road Company v. State of Missouri Ex Rel. Hines, Prosecuting Attorney of Cape Girardeau County case in 1909 revolved around the issue of whether a private corporation could be compelled to perform public duties without compensation. The Scott County Macadamized Road Company was chartered by an act of the Missouri legislature and given authority over certain roads within its jurisdiction, including their maintenance and repair. However, when it failed to maintain...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Fuller Court
Term: 1909
Docket: 52
215 U.S. 336
30 S. Ct. 110
54 L. Ed. 221
1909 U.S. LEXIS 1762
Argued: Dec 07, 1909

Scott County Macadamized Road Company v. State Of Missouri Ex Rel. Hines, Prosecuting Attorney Of Cape Girardeau County

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The Scott County Macadamized Road Company v. State of Missouri Ex Rel. Hines, Prosecuting Attorney of Cape Girardeau County case in 1909 revolved around the issue of whether a private corporation could be compelled to perform public duties without compensation. The Scott County Macadamized Road Company was chartered by an act of the Missouri legislature and given authority over certain roads within its jurisdiction, including their maintenance and repair. However, when it failed to maintain these roads adequately, the state sought to compel performance through mandamus proceedings (a court order compelling someone to execute a duty they are legally obligated to complete). The company argued that this would constitute involuntary servitude as prohibited by the Thirteenth Amendment since it wouldn't receive any compensation for performing these services. However, the Supreme Court ruled against them stating that corporations do not have personal rights under constitutional amendments designed for individual protection from government action such as those found in Thirteenth Amendment prohibiting slavery or involuntary servitude. Therefore, they can be required by law or charter obligations to perform certain acts even if no direct payment is provided.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Scott County Macadamized Road Company v. State of Missouri, it was argued that the majority's decision to uphold a state law requiring private road companies to maintain their roads in good condition or face penalties was an infringement on contractual rights. The dissenting justices believed that this ruling essentially allowed states to alter contracts at will, which they saw as a violation of the Contract Clause of the U.S. Constitution. They contended that once a contract had been made and obligations defined by both parties involved, neither party should be able to change those terms unilaterally without consent from all parties involved - including private corporations like road companies who have entered into agreements with states regarding maintenance responsibilities for public infrastructure projects.

Opinion written by Justice OWHolmes
Decided: Dec 20, 1909
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms