Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

S. D. Warren Company v. Maine Board Of Environmental Protection Et Al.

• 2005 • 547 U.S. 370 • Roberts Court
In the case of S. D. Warren Company v. Maine Board of Environmental Protection, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Maine's environmental regulators, affirming that states have authority under the Clean Water Act to impose conditions on hydropower projects even if they are federally licensed. The dispute arose when S.D. Warren Co., a paper manufacturer operating five dams on a river in Maine, argued that its dams did not result in discharge into navigable waters and thus should be exempt from...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Roberts Court
Term: 2005
Docket: 04-1527
547 U.S. 370
126 S. Ct. 1843
164 L. Ed. 2d 625
2006 U.S. LEXIS 3955
Argued: Feb 21, 2006

S. D. Warren Company v. Maine Board Of Environmental Protection Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Questions presented:
SCOTUS Records

04-1527 S. D. WARREN CO. V. MAINE BD OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DECISION BELOW: 868 A2d 210 LIMITED TO QUESTION 1 PRESENTED BY THE PETITION. CERT. GRANTED 10/11/2005 QUESTION PRESENTED: 1. Does the mere flow of water through an existing dam constitute a "discharge" under Section 401, 33 U.S.C. § 1341, of the Clean Water Act, despite this Court's holding last year in Miccosukee that a discharge requires the addition of water from a distinct body of water? 2. Does the State of Maine's expansive application of Section 401 conflict with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's comprehensive licensing authority over hydroelectric generating projects under the Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. §§ 791a et seq.? LOWER COURT CASE NUMBER: Cum-04-314

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of S. D. Warren Company v. Maine Board of Environmental Protection, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Maine's environmental regulators, affirming that states have authority under the Clean Water Act to impose conditions on hydropower projects even if they are federally licensed. The dispute arose when S.D. Warren Co., a paper manufacturer operating five dams on a river in Maine, argued that its dams did not result in discharge into navigable waters and thus should be exempt from state certification requirements under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act (CWA). However, both lower courts and ultimately the Supreme Court disagreed with this argument stating that dam operations do cause changes to water quality which falls within jurisdictional boundaries set by CWA for state regulation.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the S. D. Warren Company v. Maine Board of Environmental Protection case, there was no dissenting opinion recorded as it was a unanimous decision by the Supreme Court justices in favor of the Maine Board of Environmental Protection et al., 2006. The court ruled that dams operated by paper mills on rivers in Maine were subject to federal licensing requirements under section 401 of the Clean Water Act because they cause changes in water flow and temperature which constitute "discharge" into U.S waters, thus requiring certification from state authorities for compliance with environmental standards before obtaining or renewing licenses from Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC).

Opinion written by Justice DHSouter
Decided: May 15, 2006
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcript
Argued: Oct 05, 2026
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms