Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. San Diego County District Council Of Carpenters

• 1977 • 436 U.S. 180 • Burger Court
The U.S. Supreme Court case Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. San Diego County District Council of Carpenters in 1977 revolved around the issue of labor disputes and picketing activities on private property rights. The San Diego County District Council of Carpenters union had been peacefully picketing at a Sears store to protest against non-union carpentry work being done there, but they were not directly involved with any labor dispute with Sears itself. The company filed suit seeking an injunction to...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Burger Court
Term: 1977
Docket: 76-750
436 U.S. 180
98 S. Ct. 1745
56 L. Ed. 2d 209
1978 U.S. LEXIS 25
Argued: Nov 07, 1977

Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. San Diego County District Council Of Carpenters

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The U.S. Supreme Court case Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. San Diego County District Council of Carpenters in 1977 revolved around the issue of labor disputes and picketing activities on private property rights. The San Diego County District Council of Carpenters union had been peacefully picketing at a Sears store to protest against non-union carpentry work being done there, but they were not directly involved with any labor dispute with Sears itself. The company filed suit seeking an injunction to stop the picketing activity claiming it was trespassing on their private property rights and causing business disruption. The court ruled in favor of Sears stating that under federal law, specifically the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), state courts could not prohibit peaceful picketing when no labor dispute existed between the employer and its employees or between it and the union conducting such action unless if it interfered with normal business operations or caused significant harm to property interests.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. San Diego County District Council of Carpenters, Justice Brennan argued that the majority's decision to deny federal jurisdiction over state trespass laws was misguided and inconsistent with previous rulings on similar cases. He contended that labor disputes should be considered under federal law due to their national significance and potential impact on interstate commerce. Furthermore, he criticized the majority's reliance on a distinction between "arguably protected" and "arguably prohibited" conduct in determining jurisdictional boundaries as arbitrary and confusing. In his view, this approach could lead to unnecessary litigation by forcing parties involved in labor disputes to guess whether their actions would fall within or outside these categories.

Opinion written by Justice JPStevens
Decided: May 15, 1978
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcript
Argued: Oct 05, 2026
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms