Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Selliger v. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, By Alexander, Revenue Agent

• 1908 • 213 U.S. 200 • Fuller Court
The U.S. Supreme Court case Selliger v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, by Alexander, Revenue Agent in 1908 revolved around the issue of taxation and interstate commerce. The plaintiff, a resident of Indiana who sold liquor to customers in Kentucky via mail order or delivery services without having a physical presence or license in Kentucky was sued for tax evasion by the state's revenue agent. The plaintiff argued that his business operations were protected under the Interstate Commerce Act which...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Fuller Court
Term: 1908
Docket: 115
213 U.S. 200
29 S. Ct. 449
53 L. Ed. 761
1909 U.S. LEXIS 1867
Argued: Mar 16, 1909

Selliger v. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, By Alexander, Revenue Agent

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The U.S. Supreme Court case Selliger v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, by Alexander, Revenue Agent in 1908 revolved around the issue of taxation and interstate commerce. The plaintiff, a resident of Indiana who sold liquor to customers in Kentucky via mail order or delivery services without having a physical presence or license in Kentucky was sued for tax evasion by the state's revenue agent. The plaintiff argued that his business operations were protected under the Interstate Commerce Act which prohibits states from taxing businesses operating across state lines unless they have a physical presence within their borders. However, the court ruled against him stating that while it is true that states cannot impose taxes on interstate commerce as per federal law; this does not exempt individuals from paying taxes on goods sold within those states even if they are conducting business remotely from another location outside its jurisdictional boundaries. Therefore, despite being based out-of-state he was still liable to pay sales tax for all transactions made with customers residing inside Kentucky since these constituted local rather than interstate trade activities according to existing laws at that time.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Sellinger v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, Justice Harlan argued that the majority's decision was inconsistent with previous rulings and violated constitutional principles. He contended that a state cannot impose taxes on goods imported from other states or foreign countries while they remain in their original packages and have not yet been mixed with general property of the state. The justice believed this principle to be fundamental to free trade among states, which is protected by the Constitution. In his view, allowing such taxation would lead to protectionism at a state level, undermining national unity and economic integration. Furthermore, he disagreed with the majority's interpretation of 'original package', arguing it should include any form in which goods are delivered by an importer for sale.

Opinion written by Justice OWHolmes
Decided: Apr 05, 1909
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms