Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Donna E. Shalala, Secretary Of Health And Human Services v. Margaret Whitecotton Et Al.

• 1994 • 514 U.S. 268 • Rehnquist Court
The U.S. Supreme Court case Donna E. Shalala, Secretary of Health and Human Services v. Margaret Whitecotton et al., 1994 revolved around the interpretation of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA). The respondents, parents of a child who suffered severe disabilities after receiving a diphtheria-pertussis-tetanus vaccine, sought compensation under NCVIA's no-fault system for vaccine-related injuries or death. They argued that their daughter’s condition was caused by the vaccination...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Rehnquist Court
Term: 1994
Docket: 94-372
514 U.S. 268
115 S. Ct. 1477
131 L. Ed. 2d 374
1995 U.S. LEXIS 2842
Argued: Feb 28, 1995

Donna E. Shalala, Secretary Of Health And Human Services v. Margaret Whitecotton Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The U.S. Supreme Court case Donna E. Shalala, Secretary of Health and Human Services v. Margaret Whitecotton et al., 1994 revolved around the interpretation of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA). The respondents, parents of a child who suffered severe disabilities after receiving a diphtheria-pertussis-tetanus vaccine, sought compensation under NCVIA's no-fault system for vaccine-related injuries or death. They argued that their daughter’s condition was caused by the vaccination she received when she was an infant. However, they were unable to provide conclusive medical proof linking her disability with the vaccine due to lack of diagnostic studies at that time. The court ruled in favor of Shalala stating that petitioners must show not only a temporal connection but also medical evidence supporting causation between vaccination and injury as per Section 300aa–11(c)(1)(C)(ii)of NCVIA . This ruling clarified how claims should be evaluated under this act: it is insufficient to merely demonstrate onset symptoms following immunization; claimants must present preponderant evidence showing direct causal link between vaccines and subsequent health issues.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Shalala v. Whitecotton, Justice Stevens argued that the majority's interpretation of the Vaccine Act was too narrow and failed to consider its purpose: to compensate victims of vaccine-related injuries without requiring them to prove manufacturer fault. He disagreed with their conclusion that a pre-existing condition must be completely asymptomatic prior to vaccination in order for compensation eligibility under "onset" or "significant aggravation" clauses. Instead, he proposed an approach where if a child had an underlying condition which became significantly aggravated following immunization, they should qualify for compensation even if there were minor symptoms before vaccination. This broader interpretation would better serve Congress' intent when it enacted this legislation - ensuring fair treatment and adequate compensation for those injured by vaccines.

Opinion written by Justice DHSouter
Decided: Apr 18, 1995
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcript
Argued: Oct 05, 2026
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms