Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Isaac Shelby, Complainant, v. John Bacon, Alexander Symington, Thomas Robins, James Robertson, Richard H. Bayard, James S. Newbold, Herman Cope, Thomas S. Taylor, And George Beach

1850 • 51 U.S. 56 • Taney Court
Isaac Shelby brought a case against John Bacon, Alexander Symington, Thomas Robins, James Robertson, Richard H. Bayard, James S. Newbold, Herman Cope and Thomas S. Taylor and George Beach for the wrongful possession of certain lands in Kentucky that he claimed were his own property due to an agreement between him and the defendants' predecessors-in-title from 1817. The Supreme Court held that Shelby had failed to prove title or right to possess the land because he did not have any written...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Taney Court
Term: 1850
51 U.S. 56
13 L. Ed. 326
1850 U.S. LEXIS 1451
Argued: Dec 16, 1850

Isaac Shelby, Complainant, v. John Bacon, Alexander Symington, Thomas Robins, James Robertson, Richard H. Bayard, James S. Newbold, Herman Cope, Thomas S. Taylor, And George Beach

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

Isaac Shelby brought a case against John Bacon, Alexander Symington, Thomas Robins, James Robertson, Richard H. Bayard, James S. Newbold, Herman Cope and Thomas S. Taylor and George Beach for the wrongful possession of certain lands in Kentucky that he claimed were his own property due to an agreement between him and the defendants' predecessors-in-title from 1817. The Supreme Court held that Shelby had failed to prove title or right to possess the land because he did not have any written evidence of ownership or proof of payment for it as required by Kentucky law at the time; thus they ruled in favor of Bacon et al., dismissing Shelby's claim with costs awarded against him.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion of this case, Justice Catron argued that the complainant had failed to prove his claim. He noted that although it was true that a deed from Isaac Shelby and others to John Bacon and others had been executed in 1806, there was no evidence presented at trial showing any consideration for said deed or any other proof of its validity. Furthermore, he stated that even if such evidence were present, it would not be sufficient to establish title since the statute of limitations on real estate claims in Tennessee expired after twenty years. Therefore, Justice Catron concluded that the complainant's claim should have been dismissed as time-barred under state law.

Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms