Opinion summary
Etalia.ai summary of the majority opinion
The case involved Shell Oil Company challenging the Public Service Commission of New York's regulation that required oil companies to obtain a certificate of public convenience and necessity before constructing new facilities. Shell argued this requirement was an undue burden on interstate commerce, violating the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution. The Supreme Court held that while states have authority to regulate local aspects of commerce, they cannot impose regulations that place a substantial burden on interstate trade unless there is a legitimate local interest at stake. In this instance, the Court found New York’s regulatory scheme did not sufficiently justify its impact on interstate commerce as it primarily served economic protectionism rather than addressing genuine safety or environmental concerns.
Opinion written by Justice Harlan(2)
Decided 6 May 1968 · Official report