Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Sherrer v. Sherrer

• 1947 • 334 U.S. 343 • Vinson Court
In the case of Sherrer v. Sherrer, 1947, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on a matter involving divorce jurisdiction and full faith and credit between states. The couple in question had moved from Massachusetts to Florida where they obtained a divorce; however, upon returning to Massachusetts, Mrs. Sherrer sought to have their Florida divorce invalidated claiming that her husband had misrepresented his residency status in Florida at the time of their separation which was required for obtaining a...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Vinson Court
Term: 1947
Docket: 36
334 U.S. 343
68 S. Ct. 1087
92 L. Ed. 2d 1429
1948 U.S. LEXIS 2080
Argued: Oct 13, 1947

Sherrer v. Sherrer

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Sherrer v. Sherrer, 1947, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on a matter involving divorce jurisdiction and full faith and credit between states. The couple in question had moved from Massachusetts to Florida where they obtained a divorce; however, upon returning to Massachusetts, Mrs. Sherrer sought to have their Florida divorce invalidated claiming that her husband had misrepresented his residency status in Florida at the time of their separation which was required for obtaining a valid divorce there. The court held that once a state with proper jurisdiction has made its final decision regarding marital status or custody issues within its borders, other states must respect this ruling under the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the Constitution (Article IV). This clause requires each state to recognize public acts, records and judicial proceedings from every other state. Therefore even if Mr.Sherrer may have lied about his residency during their separation period in order for them both to obtain an easier "no-fault" style quickie-divorce available only in certain jurisdictions like Nevada or Florida at that time - it didn't matter because once granted by one competent court another cannot overturn it without violating constitutional law.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Sherrer v. Sherrer, Justice Frankfurter argued that the Court's decision undermined the principles of federalism and comity by allowing a state court to disregard another state's divorce decree without any substantial evidence of fraud or wrongdoing. He contended that this ruling would lead to uncertainty and confusion in family law matters, as it could potentially allow parties to relitigate issues already decided in other jurisdictions. Furthermore, he expressed concern about the potential harm caused by such practices on innocent third parties who may rely on these decrees in good faith. Therefore, he believed that unless there is clear proof of collusion or fraud which undermines public policy, states should respect each other’s judicial proceedings under Full Faith and Credit Clause.

Opinion written by Justice FMVinson
Decided: Jun 07, 1948
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms