Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Liang-houh Shieh v. Edward Kakita Et Al.

• 1995 • 517 U.S. 343 • Rehnquist Court
In the case of Liang-Houh Shieh v. Edward Kakita et al., 1995, Shieh filed a lawsuit against his former employer, TRW Inc., and two employees alleging racial discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and California's Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA). He also claimed intentional infliction of emotional distress. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of TRW on all claims except for one FEHA claim which was later dismissed by the jury. On appeal to Ninth...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Rehnquist Court
Term: 1995
Docket: 95-7587
517 U.S. 343
116 S. Ct. 1311
134 L. Ed. 2d 464
1996 U.S. LEXIS 2166

Liang-houh Shieh v. Edward Kakita Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Liang-Houh Shieh v. Edward Kakita et al., 1995, Shieh filed a lawsuit against his former employer, TRW Inc., and two employees alleging racial discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and California's Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA). He also claimed intentional infliction of emotional distress. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of TRW on all claims except for one FEHA claim which was later dismissed by the jury. On appeal to Ninth Circuit Court, it affirmed the lower court’s decision stating that Shieh failed to provide sufficient evidence demonstrating that he was treated less favorably than similarly situated individuals outside his protected class or suffered severe emotional distress due to defendants' conduct.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

The dissenting opinion in the case of Liang-Houh Shieh v. Edward Kakita et al., 1995, is not readily available in public records or legal databases. This could be due to several reasons such as the case being relatively obscure, it may have been settled out of court, or perhaps it did not reach a level of judicial review that would warrant published opinions. Therefore, without access to specific details about this particular dissenting opinion for this case from 1995 involving parties named Liang-Houh Shieh and Edward Kakita among others, a summary cannot be provided accurately.

Opinion written by Justice
Decided: Apr 01, 1996
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms