Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Singer Sewing Machine Company Of New Jersey v. Benedict, Treasurer, &C. Of Denver, Colorado

• 1912 • 229 U.S. 481 • White Court
In the case of Singer Sewing Machine Company of New Jersey v. Benedict, Treasurer, &c. Of Denver, Colorado (1912), the Supreme Court was asked to determine whether a city ordinance that required businesses with headquarters outside of the state to pay an annual license fee violated the Constitution's Commerce Clause or Fourteenth Amendment. The Singer Sewing Machine Company argued that it did because they were being taxed for doing interstate business while in-state companies were not subjected...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief White Court
Term: 1912
Docket: 289
229 U.S. 481
33 S. Ct. 942
57 L. Ed. 1288
1913 U.S. LEXIS 2461
Argued: May 05, 1913

Singer Sewing Machine Company Of New Jersey v. Benedict, Treasurer, &C. Of Denver, Colorado

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Singer Sewing Machine Company of New Jersey v. Benedict, Treasurer, &c. Of Denver, Colorado (1912), the Supreme Court was asked to determine whether a city ordinance that required businesses with headquarters outside of the state to pay an annual license fee violated the Constitution's Commerce Clause or Fourteenth Amendment. The Singer Sewing Machine Company argued that it did because they were being taxed for doing interstate business while in-state companies were not subjected to this tax. However, the court ruled against them stating that as long as there is no discrimination against out-of-state companies and if such taxes are applied equally on all businesses operating within its jurisdiction regardless of where their main office is located then it does not violate either clause in question.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

The dissenting opinion in the Singer Sewing Machine Company of New Jersey v. Benedict case argued that the tax imposed by Denver, Colorado was not unconstitutional. The justice believed that it did not violate the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause because it did not discriminate against out-of-state corporations. Instead, he viewed it as a legitimate exercise of state power to levy taxes on businesses operating within its jurisdiction. He also disagreed with the majority's interpretation of previous court rulings and maintained that they allowed states to impose different tax rates on foreign and domestic corporations if there were reasonable grounds for doing so.

Opinion written by Justice WVanDevanter
Decided: Jun 09, 1913
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms