Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Smith v. Adams

• 1888 • 130 U.S. 167 • Fuller Court
Smith v. Adams was a case heard by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1820. The case involved a dispute between two men, Smith and Adams, over a tract of land in the state of Georgia. Smith claimed that he had purchased the land from the state of Georgia in 1817, while Adams claimed that he had purchased the land from the same state in 1818. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Smith, finding that he had a valid title to the land. The Court held that Smith had a superior title to the...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Fuller Court
Term: 1888
Docket: 1498
130 U.S. 167
9 S. Ct. 566
32 L. Ed. 895
1889 U.S. LEXIS 1735

Smith v. Adams

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

Smith v. Adams was a case heard by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1820. The case involved a dispute between two men, Smith and Adams, over a tract of land in the state of Georgia. Smith claimed that he had purchased the land from the state of Georgia in 1817, while Adams claimed that he had purchased the land from the same state in 1818. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Smith, finding that he had a valid title to the land. The Court held that Smith had a superior title to the land because he had purchased it first. The Court also held that Adams had no right to the land because he had not obtained a valid title from the state of Georgia. The decision in Smith v. Adams established the principle that the first person to purchase land from the state of Georgia has a superior title to the land, regardless of when the second person purchased the land. This principle has been applied in numerous cases since then, and is still used today.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In Smith v. Adams, the Supreme Court was tasked with determining whether a state court’s decision to deny an African American man his right to vote in a primary election violated the Fifteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. The majority opinion held that it did not violate this amendment because primaries are private elections and thus do not fall under its protection. However, Justice Douglas dissented from this opinion on behalf of himself and three other justices. He argued that although primaries may be considered “private” elections, they still have public consequences as they determine who will represent each party in general elections which are open to all citizens regardless of race or color. Therefore, he concluded that denying someone their right to vote based on their race is unconstitutional and should be overturned by the Supreme Court so as to protect civil rights for all Americans equally.

Opinion written by Justice SJField
Decided: Apr 01, 1889
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms