Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Smith v. Allwright, Election Judge, Et Al.

• 1943 • 321 U.S. 649 • Stone Court
In Smith v. Allwright, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that denying African Americans the right to vote in primary elections was a violation of the 15th Amendment. The case originated from Texas where Lonnie E. Smith, an African American man, was denied a ballot for a Democratic Party primary election due to his race by S.S Allwright, an election official. At this time in Southern states like Texas, winning the Democratic primary essentially guaranteed victory in the general election because of...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Stone Court
Term: 1943
Docket: 51
321 U.S. 649
64 S. Ct. 757
88 L. Ed. 987
1944 U.S. LEXIS 875
Argued: Nov 10, 1943

Smith v. Allwright, Election Judge, Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In Smith v. Allwright, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that denying African Americans the right to vote in primary elections was a violation of the 15th Amendment. The case originated from Texas where Lonnie E. Smith, an African American man, was denied a ballot for a Democratic Party primary election due to his race by S.S Allwright, an election official. At this time in Southern states like Texas, winning the Democratic primary essentially guaranteed victory in the general election because of one-party rule; thus excluding black voters from primaries effectively disenfranchised them completely. The court's decision overturned its previous ruling on Grovey v Townsend (1935) which had upheld "white primaries". This landmark case marked significant progress towards voting rights and racial equality as it ended white-only participation within political parties' candidate selection processes.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Smith v. Allwright, Justice Roberts argued that the majority's decision to invalidate Texas' white primary elections was an overreach of federal power into state affairs. He contended that political parties were private entities and thus had a right to determine their own membership rules without government interference. Furthermore, he asserted that there was no constitutional violation because African Americans still had the opportunity to vote in general elections; they were only excluded from participating in one party's primaries. Therefore, according to Justice Roberts, this case did not involve racial discrimination but rather a question of states' rights and individual liberties which should be respected by the Supreme Court.

Opinion written by Justice SFReed
Decided: Apr 03, 1944
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms