Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Smith Et Al. v. Arkansas State Highway Employees, Local 1315, Et Al.

• 1978 • 441 U.S. 463 • Burger Court
In the case of Smith et al. v. Arkansas State Highway Employees, Local 1315, et al., the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of the state of Arkansas in 1978. The dispute arose when a local union representing non-supervisory employees at the Arkansas State Highway Department sought to use an internal mail system for communication purposes with its members who were also department employees. However, their request was denied by highway officials on grounds that it violated existing policy...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Burger Court
Term: 1978
Docket: 78-1223
441 U.S. 463
99 S. Ct. 1826
60 L. Ed. 2d 360
1979 U.S. LEXIS 95

Smith Et Al. v. Arkansas State Highway Employees, Local 1315, Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Smith et al. v. Arkansas State Highway Employees, Local 1315, et al., the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of the state of Arkansas in 1978. The dispute arose when a local union representing non-supervisory employees at the Arkansas State Highway Department sought to use an internal mail system for communication purposes with its members who were also department employees. However, their request was denied by highway officials on grounds that it violated existing policy prohibiting such usage by outside organizations. The union filed suit alleging violation of First and Fourteenth Amendment rights but both District Court and Court of Appeals upheld the decision made by highway officials stating no constitutional rights had been infringed upon as there existed alternative means for communication available to them like private mail services or home visits etcetera which did not involve using state resources.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Smith et al. v. Arkansas State Highway Employees, Local 1315, et al., Justice Thurgood Marshall argued that the majority's decision was a departure from established First Amendment principles and precedent regarding public employees' rights to freedom of association and speech. He contended that by upholding an Arkansas statute prohibiting state highway department employees from joining labor unions or engaging in collective bargaining activities, the court had effectively denied these workers their constitutional right to associate freely and express their views on matters of public concern without fear of retaliation. Furthermore, he criticized the majority's reliance on a perceived lack of evidence demonstrating actual harm caused by this prohibition as justification for its ruling; instead asserting that it is not necessary to prove actual injury when fundamental constitutional rights are at stake.

Opinion written by Justice
Decided: Apr 30, 1979
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms