Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Charles Hart Smith v. The Washington Gas Light Co.

• 1868 • 154 U.S. 559 • Chase Court
Charles Hart Smith v. The Washington Gas Light Co. was a case heard by the United States Supreme Court in 1868. The case involved a dispute between Charles Hart Smith and The Washington Gas Light Co. over a contract for the sale of gas. Smith had contracted with the company to purchase gas for a period of five years, but the company refused to honor the contract after two years. Smith then sued the company for breach of contract. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Smith, finding that the...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Chase Court
Term: 1868
Docket: 86
154 U.S. 559
14 S. Ct. 1165
19 L. Ed. 187
1869 U.S. LEXIS 1088
Argued: Feb 18, 1869

Charles Hart Smith v. The Washington Gas Light Co.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

Charles Hart Smith v. The Washington Gas Light Co. was a case heard by the United States Supreme Court in 1868. The case involved a dispute between Charles Hart Smith and The Washington Gas Light Co. over a contract for the sale of gas. Smith had contracted with the company to purchase gas for a period of five years, but the company refused to honor the contract after two years. Smith then sued the company for breach of contract. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Smith, finding that the contract was valid and enforceable. The Court held that the company had breached the contract by refusing to honor it, and that Smith was entitled to damages for the breach. The Court also held that the company was liable for any losses suffered by Smith as a result of the breach. The Court's decision in this case established the principle that contracts are binding and enforceable, and that parties who breach contracts are liable for any losses suffered by the other party. This case also established the principle that contracts must be honored in good faith, and that parties cannot simply refuse to honor contracts without consequence.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Charles Hart Smith v. The Washington Gas Light Co., Justice Field delivered a dissenting opinion, arguing that the majority's decision was inconsistent with prior Supreme Court precedent and would have far-reaching implications for contract law in general. He argued that the majority had failed to consider whether or not there were any special circumstances which might excuse Smith from his contractual obligations, such as fraud or misrepresentation on behalf of The Washington Gas Light Company. Furthermore, he noted that while it is true that parties are generally bound by their contracts, this does not mean they should be held to them when doing so would lead to an unjust result. As such, he concluded that if Smith could prove some form of wrongdoing on behalf of The Washington Gas Light Company then he should be allowed relief from his contractual obligations under certain conditions.

Opinion written by Justice SPChase
Decided: Mar 01, 1869
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms