Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. v. Mitsubishi Motors Corp.

Opinion summary

Etalia.ai summary of the majority opinion

The case involved a dispute between Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc., an automobile dealership in Puerto Rico, and Mitsubishi Motors Corporation. The conflict arose from a distribution agreement that included an arbitration clause mandating disputes be resolved through arbitration in Japan under Japanese law. Soler argued the clause was unenforceable due to public policy concerns and sought relief through local courts. The Supreme Court addressed whether the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) applied to international commercial agreements and if it preempted state laws that might invalidate such clauses based on public policy grounds. Ultimately, the Court held that the FAA does apply to international contracts involving commerce with foreign nations, reinforcing federal support for honoring arbitration agreements even when they specify foreign venues or legal systems.

Opinion written by Justice Blackmun

Decided 2 Jul 1985 · Official report

usrep473614.pdfOpen in a new tab