Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Southern Pacific Company v. Bogert Et Al., Executors Of Lawrence, Et Al.

• 1918 • 250 U.S. 483 • White Court
In the case of Southern Pacific Company v. Bogert et al., Executors of Lawrence, et al., 1918, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of Southern Pacific Company. The dispute centered around a contract for transportation services between New York and San Francisco that was entered into by Mr. Lawrence and the railroad company before his death. After his passing, Mr. Lawrence's executors sought to recover overcharges they believed were made under this agreement but had been paid without protest...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief White Court
Term: 1918
Docket: 305
250 U.S. 483
39 S. Ct. 533
63 L. Ed. 1099
1919 U.S. LEXIS 1768
Argued: Apr 17, 1919

Southern Pacific Company v. Bogert Et Al., Executors Of Lawrence, Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Southern Pacific Company v. Bogert et al., Executors of Lawrence, et al., 1918, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of Southern Pacific Company. The dispute centered around a contract for transportation services between New York and San Francisco that was entered into by Mr. Lawrence and the railroad company before his death. After his passing, Mr. Lawrence's executors sought to recover overcharges they believed were made under this agreement but had been paid without protest during Mr.Lawrence's lifetime. The court held that since these charges were not protested at the time of payment nor any notice given to retain rights against them, recovery could not be pursued after such an extended period (over six years). The court also noted that there was no evidence suggesting fraud or mistake on part of Southern Pacific Company which would have justified setting aside this rule. This decision reinforced principles regarding contractual agreements and established precedent concerning protests about overcharges in such contracts - namely that failure to object or reserve rights promptly can result in forfeiture of those claims later on.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Southern Pacific Company v. Bogert et al., it was argued that the majority's decision to allow a railroad company to avoid paying taxes on its land grants by transferring them to another corporation, which then sold them and returned the profits back, undermined public policy. The dissent contended that this maneuver allowed corporations to evade their tax obligations through legal technicalities and subterfuge. It further stated that such actions were not in line with Congress' original intent when granting these lands, which was meant as an incentive for companies to build railroads across uncharted territories rather than as a means of generating untaxed profit. Therefore, according to the dissenting justices, allowing such practices would set a dangerous precedent encouraging other corporations also seeking ways around their tax liabilities.

Opinion written by Justice LDBrandeis
Decided: Jun 09, 1919
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms