Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. Commercial Metals Co.

• 1981 • 456 U.S. 336 • Burger Court
In the case of Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. Commercial Metals Co., 1981, the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of Southern Pacific Transportation Company (SPTC). The dispute arose when SPTC sued Commercial Metals Company for damages to a railway car that was leased by Commercial Metals from SPTC and subsequently damaged during transit. The court held that under federal law, specifically the Carmack Amendment to the Interstate Commerce Act, a shipper is liable for damage caused to goods...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Burger Court
Term: 1981
Docket: 81-622
456 U.S. 336
102 S. Ct. 1815
72 L. Ed. 2d 114
1982 U.S. LEXIS 35
Argued: Mar 31, 1982

Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. Commercial Metals Co.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. Commercial Metals Co., 1981, the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of Southern Pacific Transportation Company (SPTC). The dispute arose when SPTC sued Commercial Metals Company for damages to a railway car that was leased by Commercial Metals from SPTC and subsequently damaged during transit. The court held that under federal law, specifically the Carmack Amendment to the Interstate Commerce Act, a shipper is liable for damage caused to goods during transportation even if it did not cause or could not have prevented such damage. This ruling overturned an earlier decision made by Texas courts which had found in favor of Commercial Metals on grounds that they were not negligent and thus should not be held responsible for damages.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. Commercial Metals Co., Justice Brennan, joined by Justices Marshall and Blackmun, argued that the majority's decision was inconsistent with previous rulings of the Court regarding liability under the Carmack Amendment to the Interstate Commerce Act. They contended that this amendment should be interpreted as imposing absolute liability on carriers for any damage occurring during transportation unless they can prove they were free from negligence and that damage was caused by an act of God, public enemy, authority of law or shipper himself. The dissenters believed there is no room in this framework for a comparative negligence defense which allows a carrier to reduce its liability proportionately if it can show that shipper’s own negligence contributed to loss or injury suffered.

Opinion written by Justice HABlackmun
Decided: Apr 27, 1982
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcript
Argued: Oct 05, 2026
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms