Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Southern Pine Lumber Company v. Ward

• 1907 • 208 U.S. 126 • Fuller Court
In the Southern Pine Lumber Company v. Ward case of 1907, the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of Southern Pine Lumber Company, stating that a state could not impose taxes on goods destined for export to foreign countries. The State of Texas had imposed an ad valorem tax on lumber held by the company awaiting shipment to Mexico. The court found this action unconstitutional as it violated Article I, Section 10 of the Constitution which prohibits states from imposing duties on exports without...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Fuller Court
Term: 1907
Docket: 82
208 U.S. 126
28 S. Ct. 239
52 L. Ed. 420
1908 U.S. LEXIS 1428

Southern Pine Lumber Company v. Ward

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the Southern Pine Lumber Company v. Ward case of 1907, the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of Southern Pine Lumber Company, stating that a state could not impose taxes on goods destined for export to foreign countries. The State of Texas had imposed an ad valorem tax on lumber held by the company awaiting shipment to Mexico. The court found this action unconstitutional as it violated Article I, Section 10 of the Constitution which prohibits states from imposing duties on exports without Congress's consent. This ruling reinforced that taxation power is limited and cannot interfere with commerce among states or with foreign nations.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

The dissenting opinion in the Southern Pine Lumber Company v. Ward case argued that the state of Texas did not have jurisdiction to tax property located outside its borders, even if it was owned by a company operating within the state. The justice contended that such taxation violated principles of interstate commerce and due process under the U.S. Constitution. He further asserted that while states can tax companies based on their operations within their boundaries, they cannot extend this power to assets or properties situated elsewhere as these are beyond their legal reach and control. This view emphasized respect for territorial limits of each state's taxing authority and protection against potential double taxation where multiple states could claim taxes on same property based on different justifications.

Opinion written by Justice EDEWhite
Decided: Jan 20, 1908
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms