Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Southern Railway Company v. Postal Telegraph-cable Company

• 1900 • 179 U.S. 641 • Fuller Court
In the case of Southern Railway Company v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Company, 1900, the U.S Supreme Court was tasked with determining whether a telegraph company could be held liable for damages caused by its failure to deliver a message in a timely manner. The dispute arose when Southern Railway sent an urgent telegram via Postal Telegraph-Cable requesting repair materials after one of their trains derailed. Due to negligence on part of the telegraph operator, this message was not delivered...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Fuller Court
Term: 1900
Docket: 64
179 U.S. 641
21 S. Ct. 249
45 L. Ed. 355
1901 U.S. LEXIS 1274
Argued: Nov 02, 1900

Southern Railway Company v. Postal Telegraph-cable Company

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Southern Railway Company v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Company, 1900, the U.S Supreme Court was tasked with determining whether a telegraph company could be held liable for damages caused by its failure to deliver a message in a timely manner. The dispute arose when Southern Railway sent an urgent telegram via Postal Telegraph-Cable requesting repair materials after one of their trains derailed. Due to negligence on part of the telegraph operator, this message was not delivered promptly causing significant delay in repairs and subsequent financial loss for Southern Railway. The court ruled that while telegraph companies are indeed responsible for delivering messages accurately and promptly under normal circumstances, they cannot be held accountable if unforeseen events or conditions beyond their control prevent them from doing so. However, since it was proven that there were no such hindrances in this particular instance and that the delay occurred solely due to operator's negligence at Postal Telegraph-Cable Co., it was determined that they were liable for damages incurred by Southern Railway as a result of late delivery.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Southern Railway Company v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Company, Justice Harlan argued that the majority's decision was a departure from established principles of law and equity. He contended that it was not within the power of a railroad company to grant exclusive rights to one telegraph company over another on its right-of-way without express legislative authority. The granting of such exclusivity would be contrary to public policy as it could potentially hinder competition and limit service options available to consumers. Furthermore, he disagreed with the majority's interpretation of federal legislation regulating telegraph companies, arguing that Congress intended for these laws to promote competition rather than allow monopolies in this sector. Therefore, he believed that Postal Telegraph-Cable Company should have been allowed access along Southern Railway’s lines under reasonable terms.

Opinion written by Justice DJBrewer
Decided: Jan 07, 1901
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms