Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

St. Clair County v. Interstate Sand And Car Transfer Company

• 1903 • 192 U.S. 454 • Fuller Court
In the case of St. Clair County v. Interstate Sand and Car Transfer Company, 1903, the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of St. Clair County, Illinois against a company that was dumping sand into the Mississippi River without permission from Congress or any state legislature. The county had sued to stop this practice because it violated an Illinois law prohibiting obstruction of navigable waters within its jurisdiction without legislative approval. The defendant argued that only Congress could...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Fuller Court
Term: 1903
Docket: 17
192 U.S. 454
24 S. Ct. 300
48 L. Ed. 518
1904 U.S. LEXIS 964
Argued: Mar 19, 1903

St. Clair County v. Interstate Sand And Car Transfer Company

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of St. Clair County v. Interstate Sand and Car Transfer Company, 1903, the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of St. Clair County, Illinois against a company that was dumping sand into the Mississippi River without permission from Congress or any state legislature. The county had sued to stop this practice because it violated an Illinois law prohibiting obstruction of navigable waters within its jurisdiction without legislative approval. The defendant argued that only Congress could regulate such activities under its power over interstate commerce and navigation; however, the court disagreed stating that states also have authority to protect their own navigable waters unless there is conflicting federal legislation or regulation on point which preempts them from doing so.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for St. Clair County v. Interstate Sand and Car Transfer Company, it was argued that the majority's decision to allow a county in Illinois to tax a ferryboat operating between Missouri and Illinois violated principles of interstate commerce. The dissenting justices contended that this taxation constituted an undue burden on interstate commerce, which is constitutionally prohibited under the Commerce Clause of the U.S Constitution. They maintained that while states have certain powers to levy taxes, these powers should not interfere with or impede upon free trade among states as intended by framers of the Constitution. Therefore, they disagreed with majority’s ruling permitting such state interference in interstate commercial activities.

Opinion written by Justice EDEWhite
Decided: Feb 23, 1904
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms