Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

St. Louis, Kansas City And Colorado Railroad Company v. Wabash Railroad Company And City Of St. Louis

• 1909 • 217 U.S. 247 • Fuller Court
In the 1909 case of St. Louis, Kansas City and Colorado Railroad Company v. Wabash Railroad Company and City of St. Louis, the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Wabash Railroad Company and City of St. Louis against a claim by the plaintiff that they were unfairly denied access to certain railroad tracks owned by defendants within city limits under an ordinance passed by the city council granting exclusive use rights to defendant's company only. The court held that there was no violation...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Fuller Court
Term: 1909
Docket: 301
217 U.S. 247
30 S. Ct. 510
54 L. Ed. 752
1910 U.S. LEXIS 1958
Argued: Dec 09, 1909

St. Louis, Kansas City And Colorado Railroad Company v. Wabash Railroad Company And City Of St. Louis

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the 1909 case of St. Louis, Kansas City and Colorado Railroad Company v. Wabash Railroad Company and City of St. Louis, the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Wabash Railroad Company and City of St. Louis against a claim by the plaintiff that they were unfairly denied access to certain railroad tracks owned by defendants within city limits under an ordinance passed by the city council granting exclusive use rights to defendant's company only. The court held that there was no violation or infringement on interstate commerce laws as claimed because it was within local jurisdiction for municipalities like cities to regulate their internal affairs including railroads operation without interference from federal government unless where expressly provided for in constitution or statutes enacted by Congress.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for the case between St. Louis, Kansas City and Colorado Railroad Company v. Wabash Railroad Company and City of St. Louis, it was argued that the majority's decision to uphold a city ordinance requiring railroads to elevate their tracks in certain areas infringed upon interstate commerce regulations set by Congress. The dissenting justices believed that this local law interfered with federal authority over railroad operations across state lines, which could potentially disrupt trade and transportation nationwide if other cities followed suit with similar ordinances. They also expressed concern about potential financial burdens placed on railroad companies due to these requirements, arguing that such costs might be passed onto consumers or result in decreased service quality or availability.

Opinion written by Justice MWFuller
Decided: Apr 11, 1910
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms