Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. Dickerson

• 1984 • 470 U.S. 409 • Burger Court
In the 1984 case of St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. Dickerson, the United States Supreme Court ruled in favor of St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co., overturning a lower court's decision that had awarded damages to an employee, Dickerson, under the Federal Employers' Liability Act (FELA). The FELA allows railroad workers to sue their employers for injuries sustained on the job due to negligence by their employer or co-workers. However, in this case, it was determined that there was...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Burger Court
Term: 1984
Docket: 84-914
470 U.S. 409
105 S. Ct. 1347
84 L. Ed. 2d 303
1985 U.S. LEXIS 63

St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. Dickerson

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the 1984 case of St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. Dickerson, the United States Supreme Court ruled in favor of St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co., overturning a lower court's decision that had awarded damages to an employee, Dickerson, under the Federal Employers' Liability Act (FELA). The FELA allows railroad workers to sue their employers for injuries sustained on the job due to negligence by their employer or co-workers. However, in this case, it was determined that there was insufficient evidence presented at trial demonstrating such negligence on part of the railway company leading directly to Mr.Dickerson’s injury and subsequent disability claim; therefore he could not be compensated under FELA provisions as per previous ruling by Arkansas Supreme Court.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. Dickerson, Justice Brennan disagreed with the majority's interpretation of the Federal Employers' Liability Act (FELA). He argued that FELA was designed to provide broad protection for railroad workers and should be interpreted liberally in their favor. The majority held that a worker could not recover damages under FELA unless he or she could prove negligence on part of the employer, but Brennan contended this requirement was too strict and inconsistent with Congress's intent when it enacted FELA. Instead, he believed any injury occurring during employment should be compensable regardless of whether there is proof of negligence by an employer.

Opinion written by Justice
Decided: Mar 04, 1985
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms